The announcement of an India-Pakistan clash in the upcoming Asia Cup, scheduled for September 14 in the UAE, has reignited a fierce national debate. With diplomatic ties between the two nations nearly frozen following a series of terror attacks—including Pulwama and the recent Pahalgam incident—many Indians are questioning the logic of engaging in sports diplomacy with Pakistan. Critics argue that cricket is more than just a game; it carries diplomatic symbolism. India has long accused Pakistan of harboring and supporting terrorism, calling it out on global platforms. In this context, agreeing to a cricket match appears not only contradictory but also insensitive to the families of martyred soldiers. Veterans, citizens, and political leaders alike have voiced strong opposition, recalling how Pakistani artists and media were previously banned in response to terror incidents. The BCCI is under fire, with some questioning whether it had formally approved the Asia Cup schedule. This has led to concerns about the autonomy of the Asian Cricket Council and whether India has lost control over decisions that reflect national sentiment. Supporters of the match argue that sports should remain separate from politics. However, with emotions running high, many believe that national security and public sentiment must take precedence over sporting tradition. The call is clear: when diplomacy is dead and blood has been shed, cricket cannot be business as usual. As the match date nears, pressure is mounting on the Indian government and the BCCI to take a firm stand. The nation awaits a decision that reflects its values and honors its sacrifices. Should India play cricket with a country it accuses of sponsoring terrorism? Or is it time to draw the line between sport and national pride?