Back to news
School ordered to pay €9,000 to male student discriminated against for wearing one earring
@Source: thejournal.ie
Advertisement
We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
One-off amount
I already contribute
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Investigates
Investigates
Money Diaries
Daft.ie Property Magazine
Allianz Home Magazine
The 42 Sports Magazine
The Journal TV
Climate Crisis
Cost of Living
Road Safety
Newsletters
Temperature Check
Inside the Newsroom
The Journal Investigates
The Explainer
A deep dive into one big news story
Sport meets news, current affairs, society & pop culture
have your say
Or create a free account to join the discussion
Advertisement
More Stories
Shutterstock
Discrimination
School ordered to pay €9,000 to male student discriminated against for wearing one earring
The WRC found that the student had been discriminated on the grounds of gender and ordered the school to change its Code of Conduct to allow students to wear one earring.
5.42pm, 27 May 2025
Share options
A SECONDARY SCHOOL student has been awarded €9,000 in compensation after a Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) hearing found that he was the victim of gendered discrimination due to not being allowed to wear one stud earring.
The case, which was decided earlier this month, heard that the boy had worn one stud earring to school. This was contrary to the school’s Code of Conduct, which stated that one stud earring in each ear were the only piercings allowed, the school’s representative argued.
The complainant alleged that he was the victim of discrimination on the grounds of gender and sexual orientation. He sought to ground his case under these claims under the Equal Status Act.
The boy claimed that he was both directly discriminated against and indirectly, as a girl was more likely to wear an earring in each ear by choice. It was argued that “what appears a neutral provision is not”.
It was further alleged that he was instructed to get a second piercing in his other ear if he wished to wear his current piercing, or else to remove it during school hours or cover the stud with a plaster.
Advertisement
It was set out in the complainant’s submissions that the boy had been subjected to “public humiliation, left sitting in disgrace outside the Principal’s office, removed from his normal classes for long periods… denied the privilege of going down town with his peers during school lunchtime, denied access to a boy’s field trip and left to attend a girl’s field trip, threatened with after-school detention, had his mother shouted at…”, all arising from his lack of cooperation over the issue of the single stud earring.
The school rejected his submission and said that any other student, male or female, would have been sanctioned identically. It said that it was not aware of the student’s sexual orientation, claiming that the student’s case citing harassment as a result was therefore not relevant.
The school said that many “famous men” including footballers and musicians wear stud earrings in both ears.
“There appears to be a suggestion that the requirement to wear two earrings imputes gender fluidity. This allegation is made with absolutely no evidence whatsoever,” the school’s submission said.
It claimed that the case was simply the student refusing to abide by the Code of Conduct.
The WRC Adjudicating Officer Brian Dalton found that the student had been discriminated against on the basis on gender, but not on the basis of sexual orientation. The adjudicating officer ruled that the rule regarding earrings favours females over males.
The school was ordered to amend its rule to state that students are permitted to wear only one stud earring in each ear, or one earring in one ear. The school was ordered to pay €9,000 to the student, which is to be held by his mother until he turns 18-years-old.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Support The Journal
Emma Hickey
Send Tip or Correction
Embed this post
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Email “School ordered to pay €9,000 to male student discriminated against for wearing one earring ”.
Recipient's Email
Feedback on “School ordered to pay €9,000 to male student discriminated against for wearing one earring ”.
Your Feedback
Your Email (optional)
Report a Comment
Please select the reason for reporting this comment.
Please give full details of the problem with the comment...
Code of Conduct
Discrimination
Gender Discrimination
Workplace Relations Commission
News in 60 seconds
Man arrested on suspicion of attempted murder over Liverpool parade crash
Ireland's first 'permanent' Pride rainbow road crossing faces erasure due to lack of maintenence
19 mins ago
Debunked: How misinformation swirled about the Liverpool car ramming despite police efforts
34 mins ago
Further Education
The government has announced the free college courses on offer for the next academic year
38 mins ago
housing committee
'A bad idea': Central Bank and ESRI push back against calls for reintroduction of 100% mortgages
48 mins ago
Evening Wrap
The 5 at 5: Tuesday
48 mins ago
Jury begins deliberations in Richard Satchwell murder trial
27 people hospitalised after car struck pedestrians at Liverpool Premier League victory parade
North Island
New Zealand teenager dies after taking part in rugby-inspired craze
cold war of words
Kremlin says Trump 'emotional' after US President called Putin 'absolutely crazy' over Ukraine strikes
Premier League
'Big question' is how car that rammed people was on street after parade, Liverpool mayor says
more from us
Investigates
Daft.ie Property Magazine
Allianz Home Magazine
The 42 Sports Magazine
Money Diaries
The Journal TV
Journal Media
Advertise With Us
About FactCheck
Our Network
FactCheck Knowledge Bank
Terms & Legal Notices
Terms of Use
Cookies & Privacy
Advertising
Competition
more from us
TV Listings
GAA Fixtures
The Video Review
Journal Media
Advertise With Us
Our Network
The Journal
FactCheck Knowledge Bank
Terms & Legal Notices
Terms of Use
Cookies & Privacy
Advertising
Competition
© 2025 Journal Media Ltd
Terms of Use
Cookies & Privacy
Advertising
Competition
Switch to Desktop
Switch to Mobile
The Journal supports the work of the Press Council of Ireland and the Office of the Press Ombudsman, and our staff operate within the Code of Practice. You can obtain a copy of the Code, or contact the Council, at https://www.presscouncil.ie, PH: (01) 6489130, Lo-Call 1800 208 080 or email: mailto:info@presscouncil.ie
Report an error, omission or problem:
Your Email (optional)
Create Email Alert
Create an email alert based on the current article
Email Address
One email every morning
As soon as new articles come online
Related News
16 May, 2025
Russia’s security blueprint aims to help . . .
18 Mar, 2025
WABU champ Abubakar set for second inter . . .
28 Feb, 2025
FIFA president Infantino defends Saudi W . . .
12 Mar, 2025
Geri Horner to leave stunning UK home as . . .
27 Mar, 2025
Tension as FIFA threatens to ban African . . .
11 Apr, 2025
Business News | The 25th Edition of Asia . . .
03 Apr, 2025
NFL RedZone favorite Scott Hanson lands . . .
15 Mar, 2025
Lomary U19 coach blames loss to wrong de . . .