A High Court injunction application over protests against improvement works at an 18th-century mansion in Kildare - housing some 93 female international protection applicants - has been suspended following a separate dispute over the planning status of the building. On Wednesday, Mr Justice David Nolan adjourned the injunction application relating to protests outside Ryevale House in Leixlip with liberty to re-enter. This means the injunction application is no longer urgent but could be revived if circumstances change. The protests began after works began in March to improve water pressure for the three-storey mansion which is in the middle of some 200 houses in Ryevale, Leixlip. In March, the owners of the house, ME Liberer Unlimited Company, obtained an interim injunction preventing a number of residents from interfering with Irish Water (Uisce Éireann) contractors carrying out works to improve water pressure at the building which has accommodated the international protection applicants since March 2023. The court heard Irish Water had said, after the protests began, that work would not continue given concerns for the safety of the contractor's workers. On Wednesday, when the case returned to court, Niall Handy SC, for ME Liberer, said it appeared, however, the protests had ceased because the defendants had been told by Irish Water that they would not be upgrading the supply because of the planning status of the building. His client believes it is exempted but An Bord Pleanála had found works at the property were not exempt. Counsel said this was not the issue when these protests started, counsel said. In circumstances, Mr Handy said there was no need at this stage to move the injunction and his side wrote to the defendants asking that in the event the water workers return that the protests would not resume. The defendants were however seeking that the injunction be heard, he said. Rory Kennedy BL, for the defendants, said the position was that Irish Water requires, as part of any application for works, that the applicant state that there is compliance with planning. Questioned by the judge about the alleged blockading of workers by residents, Mr Kennedy said his side did not accept what the plaintiff was claiming. There was an issue yet to be decided as to whether this was a lawful protest or an illegal blockade, he said. He said his clients are all over 70 and they wanted it to be pushed on to hearing. Mr Justice Nolan said while the defendants were over 70, they were not elderly. He (the judge) was approaching that age "and I don't regard myself as elderly". Parties in cases don't seem to understand that court time is precious, and it is not for the defendants to demand that the case be heard. It would be a waste of time depending on what happens in the future, he said. He adjourned the case generally with liberty to re-enter it should circumstances change.