Skip to content Try Ads-Free Fark It's Not News, It's Fark How To FarkLog In | Sign Up » Forgot password? Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience. If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page. Discussion Entertainment What you need to know about the 30,000-lb. bunker buster bomb that could crush Iran's nuclear weapons program. Need is a pretty strong word unless you're an Iranian nuclear scientist (apnews.com) More: Interesting, Bunker buster, International Atomic Energy Agency, Bomb, Kilogram, Enriched uranium, Bunker, Nuclear weapon, Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit 871 clicks;posted toMain »and Politics »on 18 Jun 2025 at 11:35 AM(1 hour ago) | Favorite | Watch | share: Copy Link 50 Comments Enable JavaScript for Fark in order to vote for entries. Log in (at the top of the page) to enable voting. View Voting Results:SmartestandFunniest Pocket Ninja (6) Funniest It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? (0) Funniest Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? Bold and creative idea. (10) Funniest Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? Wouldn't the rubble from the previous blast just fill up the crater? I mean, not completely, and the rubble would most likely be a bit looser than the previously compacted earth, but I think there would be diminishing returns on this investment. (0) Funniest "Bunker buster" is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. I too occasionally penetrate deep below the surface before exploding bluewave69 (6) Funniest i got my money on "Iran mysteriously gifted with 100 hypersonic nuclear weapons" if this keeps going. (1) Funniest 34 minutes ago "Israeli officials have also suggested that there are other options for it to attack Fordo in central Iran as it seeks to destroy the country's nuclear capabilities." FredoLives (3) Funniest 34 minutes ago Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? Yes, but that would also involve much more time over the target and in the case of the stealth bomber, much higher chances of detection/destruction. fragMasterFlash (1) Funniest 33 minutes ago Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. (4) Funniest 33 minutes ago They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago I suppose we'd be loaning them a B-2 as well HerptheDerp (3) Funniest 32 minutes ago What you need to know is that we need more of them. Lots more. The entire federal budget more. No money for healthcare, transportation, education, really any civil services. The only things that America needs are Police and Military, institutions of violence. Oh, also, make sure to get violently angry when HerptheDerp says we're a nation of warmongers and threaten to kill them when they say it, because we absolutely are not a nation of warmongers and anyone saying we are should be shot. /I'm in a bad mood today, so you all have to deal. FlippityFlap (3) Funniest 32 minutes ago Where have I seen the press talking about how cool our weapons are before? ...instead of why we are inserting ourselves into a sh*tpile. Hmmm. Seems like half a life ago.. HerptheDerp (1) Funniest 34 minutes ago FlippityFlap: Where have I seen the press talking about how cool our weapons are before? ...instead of why we are inserting ourselves into a sh*tpile. Hmmm. Seems like half a life ago.. The United States never met a part of the Middle East it hasn't wanted to explode Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste (5) Funniest 32 minutes ago "The operation was a success. The million bombs we dropped only destroyed Iran's evil nuclear stuff and no innocent people. It didn't even kill any mice or rats or anything. It was perfect as all the bullshiat we tell you." Western press: "That's incredible. We're the best." Lurk sober post drunk (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago MaliFinn: "Bunker buster" is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. I too occasionally penetrate deep below the surface before exploding Well that's where you and I differ, my friend. (1) Funniest 32 minutes ago fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. The fact that people here are even thinking that this is a good idea and are just fleshing out the details is chilling. (0) Funniest 35 minutes ago bluewave69: i got my money on "Iran mysteriously gifted with 100 hypersonic nuclear weapons" if this keeps going. From where? Russia probably doesn't have 100 functioning nuclear weapons and is certainly in no condition to make 100 to give away. I don't think China is going to want a new nuclear superpower. winedrinkingman (2) Funniest 32 minutes ago Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? That is basically what we tried to do with battleship guns and b17 strikes against heavy fortifications in WW2. Sometimes it worked. Sometimes, like at Monte Casino we destroyed ancient cultural heritage sights and replaced them with piles of ruble that were actually easier to defend. Other times it just did not work. We used these very same bunker busters against Iraq and against Afghanistan cave networks with very limited success for what it is worth. Also Israel has already destroyed the power plants that we're powering the centrifuges and without power they eventually irreversibly break on their own, which has already certainly happened so the follow up attack is not needed for anything other than Trumpian theater BitwiseShift (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago Turns out Trump doesn't like nuclear energy any more than solar, wind, battery energy or EVs of any kind (except the Holy Golf Cart). Just the other day he said "I don't understand why _IRAN_______ supported me. He knows I never liked __THE COUNTRY____." That's advertising some very good negotiating skills. If you don't get the story of your super bargaining skill's just bomb the other party back to the stone age. You know, treat them like family. (0) Funniest 31 minutes ago I'm confused. Are we at war with Iran or not? fragMasterFlash (0) Funniest 31 minutes ago bizzwire: fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. The fact that people here are even thinking that this is a good idea and are just fleshing out the details is chilling. Diplomacy works best when you have already asserted dominance. Do you want a thousand Fordo sites to pop up in response to destruction of the original? Maybe proving you can destroy it without actually doing so might serve as a better negotiating point? danielscissorhands (0) Funniest 33 minutes ago deadsanta: "Israeli officials have also suggested that there are other options for it to attack Fordo in central Iran as it seeks to destroy the country's nuclear capabilities." [Fark user image image 212x238] Dyslexic people may not get the joke. WillJM8528 (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago bizzwire: fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. The fact that people here are even thinking that this is a good idea and are just fleshing out the details is chilling. Propaganda works. Like...REALLY well. (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago tothekor: I'm confused. Are we at war with Iran or not? Wait half an hour, the answer's gonna change. And then again half an hour after that. Obscene_CNN (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago Obligatory Powerman 5000 - Bombshell mcreadyblue (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. What if there are multiple entrances? What if they possessed the technology to tunnel thru and make a new entrance? (1) Funniest 31 minutes ago RasIanI: They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. I don't think there's much left of their air defenses. That's not the reason to not do this. Wenchmaster (2) Funniest 34 minutes ago Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? Not really. Most gravity bombs are fused for contact or air-burst detonation. For bunker-busting, you need a bomb with a hardened nose cone and a delayed fuse set to detonate a certain interval after impact. Drop a basketball-shaped metal object from a given height and note the depth of ground penetration. Then drop a football-shaped metal object of the same mass from the same height and see how much deeper it penetrates the surface. Bombs without hardened nose cones tend to waste most of the explosive energy skyward. A series of 52 250-kilogram explosives (note the net explosive yield is the same as the bunker-buster) going off at ground level will cause a lot less underground damage than a single 15 kiloton explosive detonating 50 meters underground. Then there's the problem of repeated hits on the same location. With unguided gravity bombs, this is remarkably difficult. Most bunker-busters are laser-guided to ensure accuracy, and even then the circular-error probability (CEP) for follow-up strikes is relatively large due to dust and smoke from the first bomb. Don Cherry's tailor (0) Funniest 33 minutes ago Just send the sappers in to dig underneath it and plant some TNT. danielscissorhands (2) Funniest 32 minutes ago RasIanI: They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. justanotherfarkinfarker (1) Funniest 31 minutes ago Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? Nope. Look at Monte Casino. That's what happens when you just keep dropping thousands upon thousands of pounds of explosives on the same pile of rubble. I'm sure they've moved everything out and we saw it all on satellite. So the whole point is moot. farkitallletitend (3) Funniest 33 minutes ago Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? The bombs do little damage to the bunker when exploding on the surface. Penetrating the bunker uses the concussive wave to build pressure from the inside destroying the interior. asmodeus224 (0) Funniest 32 minutes ago HerptheDerp: What you need to know is that we need more of them. Lots more. The entire federal budget more. No money for healthcare, transportation, education, really any civil services. The only things that America needs are Police and Military, institutions of violence. Oh, also, make sure to get violently angry when HerptheDerp says we're a nation of warmongers and threaten to kill them when they say it, because we absolutely are not a nation of warmongers and anyone saying we are should be shot. /I'm in a bad mood today, so you all have to deal. But der military keeps us safe.* *offer not valid in LA or on 9-11 (1) Funniest 31 minutes ago Referenced Bunker Buster Bomb Test Drop 8:26 video,Booming starts at 3:13 Video specifically references Iran's nuclear program. fragMasterFlash (0) Funniest 34 minutes ago mcreadyblue: fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. What if there are multiple entrances? What if they possessed the technology to tunnel thru and make a new entrance? You don't target an entry point to deny access, you soften an entry point to make it clear that any return visitation will be far more destructive. To your point, they would need contingency plans to harden compromised ingress points before a follow-up attack compromises the entire site. (0) Funniest less than a minute ago tothekor: I'm confused. Are we at war with Iran or not? Cruz said we are. (1) Funniest less than a minute ago fragMasterFlash: bizzwire: fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. The fact that people here are even thinking that this is a good idea and are just fleshing out the details is chilling. Diplomacy works best when you have already asserted dominance. Do you want a thousand Fordo sites to pop up in response to destruction of the original? Maybe proving you can destroy it without actually doing so might serve as a better negotiating point? Obviously the master of the deal had this all planned out. It isn't that he is weak, has no vision, and viewed by other world leaders as spineless and malleable. Allegedly said no to Israel. They decided to do it anyway. In the middle of trump "negotiations" with Iran. Orange turd waffles, starts taking credit, spinning it, getting convinced by bibi to join the fun. There is no master plan, just chaos, propaganda, and revisionist history to either take credit or assign blame. Autoerotic Defenestration (0) Funniest less than a minute ago MelGoesOnTour (0) Funniest less than a minute ago RasIanI: They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. I doubt that it can penetrate 200' into rock before exploding. That makes no sense to me. I mean, does it have a drill bit on the nose? (3) Funniest less than a minute ago RasIanI: They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. Iranian air defenses have been pretty much zero since Israel went in a couple days ago. Israel established air superiority over Iran from 1,000 miles away on day 1. (0) Funniest less than a minute ago MelGoesOnTour: RasIanI: They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. I doubt that it can penetrate 200' into rock before exploding. That makes no sense to me. I mean, does it have a drill bit on the nose? It's a heavy, aerodynamic, hardened steel rod dropped from very high altitude so its going fast when it hits. It just plows through the ground until the detonator says it's time to go off. (0) Funniest less than a minute ago eKonk: Pocket Ninja: It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. Well, I mean, OK. That's cool, I guess. But couldn't you technically do this with any bomb? Just keep dropping more into the crater left by previous ones until you've blasted down as deep as you want to go? Wouldn't the rubble from the previous blast just fill up the crater? I mean, not completely, and the rubble would most likely be a bit looser than the previously compacted earth, but I think there would be diminishing returns on this investment. I would think you'd eventually hit a limit. My assumption would be that the smaller bunker buster would "dig" deeper if instead of solid reinforced concrete it is meeting with rubble that's got gaps. But it would seem like the number of smaller bombs to be dropped to gain a few inches at a time until you still fall short of the mark might get expensive, logistically difficult and annoying. (0) Funniest less than a minute ago Why TF is the tagline Bangkok? I'll admit, it'd be a cool nickname for the bomb in the picture. The Repeated Meme (0) Funniest less than a minute ago Going to make a stab in the dark prediction: There's a bunch of bombers from Diego Garcia in a holding pattern beside refueling planes waiting for the yay/nay for a strike on Fordow. Drop bombs on the mountain, wipe hands on pants, leave. Fart_Machine (0) Funniest less than a minute ago bhirt: fragMasterFlash: bizzwire: fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. The fact that people here are even thinking that this is a good idea and are just fleshing out the details is chilling. Diplomacy works best when you have already asserted dominance. Do you want a thousand Fordo sites to pop up in response to destruction of the original? Maybe proving you can destroy it without actually doing so might serve as a better negotiating point? Obviously the master of the deal had this all planned out. It isn't that he is weak, has no vision, and viewed by other world leaders as spineless and malleable. Allegedly said no to Israel. They decided to do it anyway. In the middle of trump "negotiations" with Iran. Orange turd waffles, starts taking credit, spinning it, getting convinced by bibi to join the fun. There is no master plan, just chaos, propaganda, and revisionist history to either take credit or assign blame. I think it was CNN where they quote an Israeli general as saying getting the US involved was always part of the plan. Trump has been played by Netanyahu the entire time. (0) Funniest less than a minute ago The Repeated Meme: Going to make a stab in the dark prediction: There's a bunch of bombers from Diego Garcia in a holding pattern beside refueling planes waiting for the yay/nay for a strike on Fordow. Drop bombs on the mountain, wipe hands on pants, leave. Theoretically there are Israeli planes that could carry the 57 if we gave them the software package or have previously "leant" it to them for review. The F15 e/x has ~30,000lb payload capacity. It just depends on how involved the US is willing to get and if we want the world to see US planes flying in direct support of Israel against Iran. justanotherfarkinfarker (0) Funniest less than a minute ago MelGoesOnTour: RasIanI: They can penetrate to 200" below the surface. Iranian underground facilities are at a depth of 295". So, multiple B-52 sorties deep into Iranian airspace. I doubt that it can penetrate 200' into rock before exploding. That makes no sense to me. I mean, does it have a drill bit on the nose? They've tested and used them, and that is the unclassified figure. I bet in ideal that's not far off, if not more. It's probably maxed depending on geology. If you're bombing a granite slab of a mountain in NH. Well probably not getting close to that. Some soft rock sandstone and old seabed probably 200' would happen. You gotta remember that farker his coming down from like 50k feet, hitting terminal velocity. Then it punches in I assume with tungsten. Then the blast wave would cause structural failure well below the depth it physically makes it. I've been miles from rock quarries doing underground blasting and you can feel the blast wave in the earth. Imagine being 50ft under a few thousand lbs of kaboom going off. Lemmy's Warts (0) Funniest less than a minute ago mcreadyblue: fragMasterFlash: Or how about you simply target the bunker opening with traditional weapons before you drop the BIG ONE instead of wasting BILLION$ dropping a single all-in-one ka-boomer? That window of diplomacy between softening the target and completely neutralizing it has far more value than the morons Trump and Hegseth will ever be capable of understanding, IMHO. What if there are multiple entrances? What if they possessed the technology to tunnel thru and make a new entrance? From what the internet has taught me, that would require at least a three-way. (0) Funniest less than a minute ago At that price...DON'T MISS! Coworker has a friend who's son is a B2 pilot, told his father he won't be available for 48 hours but he would be ok... wink wink In April 2011, the USAF ordered eight MOPs plus supporting equipment, for $28 million.[19] In September 2011, the Air Force took delivery of 20 bombs, designed to be delivered by the B-2 bomber. In February 2012, Congress approved $81.6 million to further develop and improve the weapon.[20] In November 2011, Bloomberg reported that the Air Force Global Strike Command began receiving the Massive Ordnance Penetrator and that the deliveries "will meet requirements for the current operational need".[21] The Air Force had received delivery of 16 MOPs by November 2011.[22] In March 2012, there was an "operational stockpile" at Whiteman Air Force Base.[23] In 2012, the Pentagon requested $82 million to develop greater penetration power for the existing weapon.[2] A 2013 report stated that the development had been a success,[24] and B-2 integration testing began that year.[25] (0) Funniest less than a minute ago I remember these from back in the day: Displayed 50 of 50 comments Enable JavaScript for Fark in order to vote for entries. Log in (at the top of the page) to enable voting. View Voting Results:SmartestandFunniest Redisplay/refresh comments If you're having problems voting, quoting, or posting comments, try disabling any browser add-ons that might disable Javascript (NoScript, AdBlock, etc).See our FAQ. Forgot password? Create an account to make comments Remember me If you can see this, something's wrong with your browser's CSS support. (Or you're a spambot.) If you are using the NoScript browser extension, you may have problems posting comments, especially if they contain images.For a fix, see this FAQ entry.If you still have problems, contact Farkback. Before adding a comment, please take a minute to review our posting rules and our legal/privacy policy. By commenting, you agree to these terms. You might also want to take a look at our FAQ. If you like these links, you'll love The next best thing to UltraFark learn more | sign up Support Fark Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter! Headlines of the Month Fark NotNewsletter TotalFark signup BareFark signup Purchase FarkUnits Purchase OhFark Top Comments Top Submitters Top Smart Comments Top Sources/Topics Top Funny Comments Press/Publicity Link Voting Sports Forum Fandom Forum Entertainment Forum Politics Forum Fark Parties Fark Party Forum PS/Photo Browser Photoshop Forum Farktography Forum Discussion/TF Live Forum Top Commented Top Commented ▼ Top Commented Top Clicked My Recent Commented Recent Mentions Javascript is required to view headlines in widget. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them. You need to create an account to submit links or post comments. Click here to submit a link. Also on Fark Today's 2-hour serving of '80s alt/post-punk/new wave includes music from Bad Manners, World Party, and #synthministryisbestministry. Hear what commercial radio doesn't sound like on pastFORWARD #713. Starts @ 1:00 PM ET, LGT streaming options ( kuci.org ) » (9 comments) Today's 2-hour serving of '80s alt/post-punk/new wave includes music from Bad Manners, World Party, and #synthministryisbestministry. Hear what commercial radio doesn't sound like on pastFORWARD #713. Starts @ 1:00 PM ET, LGT streaming options ( kuci.org ) » (9 comments) Having broken the NHL, it took the Florida Panthers just minutes to break the Stanley Cup ( sportingnews.com ) » (18 comments) Does this mean that we should go long on Canadian cheese exports? ( bnnbloomberg.ca ) » (2 comments) Octopuses continue to prove their ability to be our superiors ( mcb.harvard.edu ) » (1 comment) Entertainment Will Smith admits he lost all control when he told his kids to be honest. Unlike the time he told Chris Rock to shut up ( atlantablackstar.com ) » (0 comments) In news that should surprise precisely zero people, Netflix is canceling a lovingly made and lovingly watched series ( arstechnica.com ) » (11 comments) They were looking for boys. It's a Surrey tradition ( cbc.ca ) » (1 comment) Go the F**k to Sleep, Idaho ( thetakeout.com ) » (24 comments) Toddler Trump has a really big bomb in his toy box at the Pentagon and he wants to drop it on Iran's sandbox ( factkeepers.com ) » (6 comments) Fark :: Main | Discussion | Sports | Business | STEM | Entertainment | Fandom | D'awww | Food | Politics Total Fark :: TotalFark | TF Live | TF Advice | TF Discussion | Commented | Top Voted | Greenlit FArQ :: About Us | Quick Answers | Posting Rules | Farkisms Contests :: Photoshop | Farktography | Caption Buy Fark :: Fark Book | Fark Store Submit a Link » Copyright © 1999 - 2025 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 18 2025 12:46:19 Contact Us via Farkback | Report a bug/error msg | Terms of service/legal/privacy policy | Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Runtime: 0.241 sec (240 ms)