Advertisement We need your help now Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open. You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough. If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it. One-off amount I already contribute Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you. An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more. Investigates Investigates Money Diaries Daft.ie Property Magazine Allianz Home Magazine The 42 Sports Magazine The Journal TV Climate Crisis Cost of Living Road Safety Newsletters Temperature Check Inside the Newsroom The Journal Investigates The Explainer A deep dive into one big news story Sport meets news, current affairs, society & pop culture have your say Or create a free account to join the discussion Advertisement More Stories Debunked: How misinformation swirled about the Liverpool car ramming despite police efforts Photos of a man not involved in the incident were spread with claims he was the driver. 5.13pm, 27 May 2025 Share options A CAR RAMMING in Liverpool left dozens injured yesterday evening, and was quickly followed by misinformation, speculation, and conspiracy theories about the suspect. The city’s mayor has said that four people are still “very, very ill in hospital” after the car ploughed into a crowd yesterday during the parade celebrating Liverpool’s Premier League title win. Police quickly arrested a 53-year-old man after the incident and identified him as a white man from the Liverpool area, but that didn’t stop speculation about the incident from spreading rapidly online. Initially, some claims focused on whether the ramming was an intentional terror attack, a claim the police have dismissed. However, even after the suspect’s ethnicity and local background was revealed, there was baseless speculation that the police had arrested the wrong person, or had purposely released misleading information, or were engaging in a cover-up. The suspect remains in custody where he is being interviewed on suspicion of attempted murder among other charges. Fears of terrorism The suspect was arrested by police after the incident in Water Street in Liverpool city centre, and four children were among around 50 who were injured – including one child who was seriously hurt. Merseyside Police said the suspect was the driver of the car, a white, British man from the Liverpool area, and added that the incident was not being treated as terrorism. Witnesses at the scene disagreed on whether the ramming, videos of which were shared widely on social media, appeared deliberate or accidental. However, many online commentators noted the incident appeared to follow in the pattern of previous attacks, such as the 2016 truck ramming in Nice that killed 86 people and left hundreds of others injured. That and some similar attacks which involved the use of vehicles were carried out in the name of Islamist groups, often Islamic State. “No information has been released about the terrorist in the Liverpool car attack,” one X account said, encapsulating a widespread false assumption. “So you can be sure it’s a Muslim”. Police quickly worked to dispel these rumours, but many online commentators, especially those whose accounts show histories of anti-immigrant or anti-Muslim posts, began disputing the news that the suspect was, in fact, a white British man. The suspect’s identity “PHOTO and VIDEO of the driver from the Liverpool attack,” the beginning of one post on X said. “The initial reports said he was 53 years old and white. Those reports appear to be wrong. This is the driver,” the post says, next to a series of blurry images. “Young, and definitely not white. Cover up already running.” Two of the photos included with the post show a man in a vehicle similar to that involved in the incident. They are screenshots taken from a video and are so blurry that no features can be identified. The third photo clearly shows a young man with tanned skin, dark hair and a beard — unlike what the post says, the man in the photo could be “white”. In either case, the photo of the young man is from a completely different video — which shows he was walking on James Street, about 200 metres from the street the ramming occurred on. There is no indication that that video or the man seen in it has any relation to the ramming incident. The post saying that the suspect was “definitely not white” has been viewed more than 1,100,000 times. In a follow-up post, the person admits that the photo was “inaccurate” and that other videos indicate the driver was clean-shaven. That correction was viewed only 130,000 times. Other posts using the same images made similar claims. “MEDIA CAUGHT LYING: Liverpool attacker initially reported as a 53-year-old white male… Turns out? Young. Not white. And definitely not what they wanted you to see,” another post reads. “Same script every time: Rush the false narrative. Delay the truth. Blame you when you notice.” That post has been seen more than 958,900 times. The author has not yet corrected his post. Advertisement Other claims have been more sophisticated. In another post, a video appears to show the police taking the suspect into custody. However, the footage does not feature a clear shot of what is happening, as police and crowds trying to break through them block the view. One post with more than 1,900,000 views claims that a person being tackled by the police “looks to be a 53-year-old man”, and implies that this person – who had tried to break through the police line – is the person described as being arrested A screenshot of the video showing a man being arrested “The ‘White 53-year-old’ who was arrested in Liverpool was actually arrested for something else,” one such post parroting this claim reads. All the posts mentioned that shared these claims were from accounts that had a blue tick. Previous to Elon Musk’s takeover, these ticks signified that the account belonged to a public figure or organisation, often politicians, recognised authorities or journalists. While X still refers to these accounts as being “verified”, these ticks now indicate that the account has paid for a subscription, and scam accounts regularly have these “verification” ticks. Paid subscribers are also eligible for X’s Creator Revenue Sharing programme, where accounts get paid for getting high engagement with their posts. At the time of writing, none of these posts have a Community Note indicating that they are inaccurate. Police communications Other commentators accepted that the police were unlikely to be deliberately misleading the public in such a high-profile case, yet complained about what they saw as a double standard. “It’s INSANE that the media are RELENTLESSLY spouting the fact the Liverpool attacker is White within ONE HOUR,” one post on X read. “But when it’s a Muslim attacker, police wait DAYS. Britain is full of Islamic apologists. TAKE YOUR COUNTRY BACK, BRITS!” The post, on the verified account of an American conservative commentator, was viewed more than 563,700 times. “Why are they never this quick to disclose the identity and the background, and the heritage of terrorists when they’re from a Muslim background?” asked Paul Golding, the leader of the far-right political party Britain First, in a video viewed more than 3,700,000 times. “Just look at Southport. They left us waiting weeks and months. They covered it up. They said it was a quiet Welsh choirboy of Christian background. Turns out, it was an Islamist radicalised by Al Qaeda. Why the different approach?” The Southport attacker, a seventeen-year-old boy who stabbed three children to death last July, was born in Wales to a Christian family who were originally from Rwanda. The suspect was found to have possessed an al Qaeda PDF, however evidence has not supported claims that terrorism was the motive for his attack. Misinformation about the Southport attacker, including that he was an asylum seeker, spurred riots across England and Northern Ireland, often targeting Muslims and asylum seekers. Southport’s shadow A former Metropolitan Police chief superintendent said it was “unprecedented” that the police “very quickly” gave the ethnicity and race of the suspect in the Liverpool incident. Dal Babu told BBC Radio 5 Live: “It was Merseyside Police who didn’t give that information with the Southport horrific murders of those three girls, and the rumours were that it was an asylum seeker who arrived on a boat and it was a Muslim extremist and that wasn’t the case. “I’ve never known a case like this before where they’ve given the ethnicity and the race of the individual who was involved in it, so I think that was to dampen down some of the speculation from the far-right that sort of continues on X even as we speak that this was a Muslim extremist and there’s a conspiracy theory.” Babu said that yesterday’s incident showed the Merseyside Police had learned the lessons from what happened after Southport. He said: “They have to balance that against the potential of public disorder and we had massive public disorder after the far-right extremists had spread these rumours.” He remains in custody where he is being interviewed. Ever wondered how disinformation spreads so rapidly – or who is behind it? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online. Visit Knowledge Bank The Journal’s FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network’s Code of Principles. You can read it here. For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader’s Guide here. You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise.Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Support The Journal The Journal's monthly FactCheck newsletter keeps you in the loop about what misinformation trends Ireland is experiencing - and how we're fighting back. Sign up here You are now signed up Shane Raymond Send Tip or Correction Embed this post To embed this post, copy the code below on your site Email “Debunked: How misinformation swirled about the Liverpool car ramming despite police efforts”. Recipient's Email Feedback on “Debunked: How misinformation swirled about the Liverpool car ramming despite police efforts”. Your Feedback Your Email (optional) Report a Comment Please select the reason for reporting this comment. Please give full details of the problem with the comment... Conspiracy Theories Liverpool parade Southport stabbing News in 60 seconds Man arrested on suspicion of attempted murder over Liverpool parade crash Discrimination School ordered to pay €9,000 to male student discriminated against for wearing one earring Ireland's first 'permanent' Pride rainbow road crossing faces erasure due to lack of maintenence 19 mins ago Further Education The government has announced the free college courses on offer for the next academic year 38 mins ago housing committee 'A bad idea': Central Bank and ESRI push back against calls for reintroduction of 100% mortgages 48 mins ago Evening Wrap The 5 at 5: Tuesday 48 mins ago Jury begins deliberations in Richard Satchwell murder trial 27 people hospitalised after car struck pedestrians at Liverpool Premier League victory parade North Island New Zealand teenager dies after taking part in rugby-inspired craze cold war of words Kremlin says Trump 'emotional' after US President called Putin 'absolutely crazy' over Ukraine strikes Premier League 'Big question' is how car that rammed people was on street after parade, Liverpool mayor says more from us Investigates Daft.ie Property Magazine Allianz Home Magazine The 42 Sports Magazine Money Diaries The Journal TV Journal Media Advertise With Us About FactCheck Our Network FactCheck Knowledge Bank Terms & Legal Notices Terms of Use Cookies & Privacy Advertising Competition more from us TV Listings GAA Fixtures The Video Review Journal Media Advertise With Us Our Network The Journal FactCheck Knowledge Bank Terms & Legal Notices Terms of Use Cookies & Privacy Advertising Competition © 2025 Journal Media Ltd Terms of Use Cookies & Privacy Advertising Competition Switch to Desktop Switch to Mobile The Journal supports the work of the Press Council of Ireland and the Office of the Press Ombudsman, and our staff operate within the Code of Practice. You can obtain a copy of the Code, or contact the Council, at https://www.presscouncil.ie, PH: (01) 6489130, Lo-Call 1800 208 080 or email: mailto:info@presscouncil.ie Report an error, omission or problem: Your Email (optional) Create Email Alert Create an email alert based on the current article Email Address One email every morning As soon as new articles come online